Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M +280%
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
G86
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy