Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile +7967%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
40
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
TU104
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy