Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
RTX A5000 +27950%
27.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
64
32
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GA102
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy