Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m +4996%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
2880
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK110B
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy