Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 68W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +717%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
12
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GM107
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy