Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +2551%
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
30
64
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
12
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
TU106
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy