Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 +9167%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
72
64
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
12
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
TU102
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy