Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +3216%
5.837 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
132.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
64
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
12
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.837 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GA107
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy