Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +3850%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
64
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
12
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GA106
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
12 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy