Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
10688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +21894%
38.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
84
64
Shading Units
10752
32
TMUs
336
12
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GA102
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy