CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
7120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+17396%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
VS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
7168
24
TMUs
448
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
100 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA GRID M40
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy