Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M +2258%
2.995 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GM204
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy