CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+14994%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
VS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
6144
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
AD104
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA H100 CNX
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA GRID M40
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy