Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +14994%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
6144
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
AD104
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy