NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+4722%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2009
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
108
96
Shading Units
6912
48
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA100
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
