Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +4868%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
5888
48
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA104
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy