Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +5340%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
80
96
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GV100
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy