NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Curie
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
