Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G71
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy