Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)

Score

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.278 billion
Unknown
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net