Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +257%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy