Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M +370%
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
4
8
Shading Units
32
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy