Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +55735%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
48
8
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
110W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy