Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M +16%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK107
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy