Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +5167%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

78W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy