Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M +205%
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GM107
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

78W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy