Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q +2862%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
48
112
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy