Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +7982%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
6656
56
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy