Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +1984%
5.837 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
132.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
20
112
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.837 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA107
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy