Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 12GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB +4114%
11.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
32
112
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
92.16 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.80 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.80 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy