Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +6207%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
46
112
Shading Units
5888
56
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy