Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +3846%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
108
128
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA100
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy