Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M +425%
0.352 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
G84
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy