Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +2596%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
128
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU104B
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy