Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +13499%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
153 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy