Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +2169%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
26
128
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA106
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy