Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D +990%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GF106
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

28W
TDP
62W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy