Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M +859%
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
4
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GF106
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy