CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 DGXS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 DGXS
+24013%
10.61 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
VS
Tesla P100 DGXS
Graphics Card
Dec 2009
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GP100
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Board Design
28W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
2
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
3
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
4
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
5
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
7
NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy