NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 1024MB VRAM GRID M60 1Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
GRID M60 1Q
+13685%
4.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
