NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
6640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+64557%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
6656
8
TMUs
416
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
