NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+28468%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
56
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
