NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
13296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+129214%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
13312
8
TMUs
832
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
