NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+9380%
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
