NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
10224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A5500
+97328%
34.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
10240
8
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
