NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
7408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile
+63528%
22.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
58
16
Shading Units
7424
8
TMUs
232
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
22 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
