CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+3092%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
VS
Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla C870
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy