Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +2906%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy