Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800 +41%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy