NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
+380%
2.218 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM204
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
