Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q +395%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy